September 22, 2007
紐時開放資源帶來更多獲利
經過兩年掙扎,紐約時報還是放棄採收費機制的TimesSelect(中文報導),公開op-ed的專欄內容與前20年的新聞資料。
Paid Content的Kramer訪問紐時總經理Schiller,為何停止此服務時,Schiller說:
The change is because of what’s happened in the internet in the past two years—particularly the power of search.” She added later: “Think about this recipe—millions and millions of new documents, all seo’d, double-digit advertising growth.” The Times expects “the scale and the power of the revenue that would come from that over time” to replace the subscriptions revenue and then some.
對於這種公開新聞資源的作法,當然大家都還是採正面態度,畢竟紐時的一大優勢與特色就在於它深度的分析與見解,Dan Gillmor認為,第二面的意義在於紐時將公開的20年新聞資料,因為在這段期間裡發生的許多事件,對新聞學而言都是關鍵時刻。
在這兩年來,TimesSelect約有78萬7400位訂閱者,其中近47萬1200份是以紙本訂閱,另外22萬7000份是閱讀網路版,還有8萬9200份是免費提供給大學校園學生閱讀。
為此,Jeff Jarvis寫了篇訃聞〈時代不選文〉(Times deselected),他認為TimesSelect的營利模式過於簡化,每年從讀者手中收取49.95美元的費用,他指出,對網路新聞而言,「內容收費」這個概念需要被大量修正,因為不管內容是否想要免費,它就是免費,收費的代價太高了。開放政策勢必會為紐時帶來更多流量與Google Juice。
不過TimesSelect倒是讓網路新聞業又上了一課,也就是在不傷害廣告營收的情況下,付費新聞服務可否成功,但是在這整個過程中,TimesSelect已經喪失了它在開放空間對話中應有的地位。
Jeff Jarvis點出了一個關鍵點,重點在「關係」,而不是內容或分配權。
It’s the relationship that is valuable. It’s the relationship that is profitable, not the control of the content or the distribution. That is the essential media moral of the internet story. It has taken 13 years of internet history for media companies to learn that, to give up the idea that they control something scarce they can charge consumers for, but they’ve finally learned it. That is the lesson of the death of TimesSelect.
Jay Rosen則認為關鍵在於將自己放入網路這個自由的場域中,也就是加入對話,或許TimesSelect一度成功了,但相較於網路流量所帶來的收益,仍是稍嫌不足。
When every barrier you create to their participation with your product weakens your revenue stream, which is tied to openness, you’re in the world of the consent decree. Advertising tied to search means open gates for all users. It means link rot cut to zero, playing for the long haul in Web memory and more blogs because they are Web-sticky.
新聞果真已無法依靠內容營利?Jeff Jarvis帶開了我的視野,其實有時並不只是「使用者付費」這麼狹義的定義,與其構築付費高牆,面對網路2年來的劇變,不然有效開放內容,加強建立與讀者間的關係,所以其實換個角度想,紐時還是在依賴內容獲利。
相關閱讀:
Kaida's Concious Choice:來自紐約時報(TimeSelect)的啟示:網路新聞能靠文字內容收費嗎(或許正如這位作者所說,因為市場規模,在目前的台灣而言,這樣的 business model 還是無法建立)
IX Blog:收費v.s廣告, 紐約時報選邊站
Jas 9:紐約時報放棄收費政策
Publishing 2.0:NYTimes.com Drops TimesSelect, Focuses On Search And Link-Based Economy
分享閱讀:
Publishing 2.0:Journalism Is Now A Continuous Dynamic Process, Not A Static Product
Publishing 2.0:Google News Hosting Wire Service Stories Diminishes Value Of Duplicate Content(或許也能解決一下台灣嚴重的重複報導問題?)
Publishing 2.0:New Online Advertising Models: The Scalability Problem
Rea / Write Web:Social Graph: Concepts and Issues
Posted by dreamf at September 22, 2007 1:21 AM | TrackBack | 新聞評述







