[摘]We Media 2006 不但走了回頭路，還走錯路
[摘]We Media 2006 不但走了回頭路，還走錯路
至少以下的blogger是這麼認為的。
BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » We Media
Amazingly, Google’s Arora says that big media organizations need to be concerned about the impact of using content from the people on their brands. Can you believe that Google is saying that — Google, which has built its brand soley on incorporating content from elsewhere?RConversation: WeMedia: the real question
The question we really ought to be focusing on is: how can citizens and professional journalists work together to create a better and more well-informed public discourse?We Media: Citizen Journalism Forum (Session 3) at Within / Without
It is unfortunate that people who support citizen journalism have to feel so defensive in a forum that was supposed to engage the two camps. I feel like they’ve divided them up even further.MediaShift . Live from London::Which Media Do You Trust? | PBS
Kebbel and Knight will be hosting the next We Media conference next February in Miami Beach. Hopefully by then, the Media Center will have a new survey that delves down below the generalizations of trust in media.…My heart’s in Accra » Blogging a conference I’m not even attending…
...while global news organizations seem obsessed with the bloggers/journalists “dichotomy”, local media seems more open to this idea.而我看了這些blog以後，也覺得這次的We Media會議真的走了回頭路。我以為部落客和記者、部落格和新聞的爭議應該早就結束了才對。看樣子這次會議的結論只會是又一次的觀念釐清，而不是創造新觀念和尋求新方向。
另外，這次會議中揭露的跨媒體信任度調查結果也為許多與會者所詬病，例如Jeff Jarvis和Mark Glaser都認為這樣的調查實在太泛泛而論了，甚麼是媒體？什麼是信任？甚麼情形之下的信任？那麼多的電視台、報紙、廣播、雜誌、網站、blog...每一種媒體與閱聽人建立信任關係的方式都不一樣，更別說是個別媒體管道了。
還沒看到有人blog今天的議程，再看看吧...不然真有點讓人失望啊。
